An independent, data-led comparison of Stake and BitStarz on the factors that matter: license, rakeback, KYC and live races. Rankings are independent; outbound links are affiliate links.
| License | Rakeback | KYC | Live races | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | Curaçao (Medium Rare N.V. group) | 3.5% | KYC upfront | 1 |
| BitStarz | Curaçao OGL/2024/165/0185 (Gareton B.V.) | — | No-KYC up to ≈ $10,000 | 0 |
The verdict
For rakeback, Stake leads (3.5% vs 0%); for live races on SLOTSBONUS, Stake has more (1 vs 0); both list a gambling license; and Stake verifies KYC upfront while the other stays no-KYC up to ~$10k.
Full breakdowns: Stake review · BitStarz review.
Stake vs BitStarz: FAQ
Is Stake or BitStarz better?
Neither wins outright: it depends what you value. For rakeback, Stake leads (3.5% vs 0%); for live races on SLOTSBONUS, Stake has more (1 vs 0); both list a gambling license; and Stake verifies KYC upfront while the other stays no-KYC up to ~$10k. See the table above and our full Stake and BitStarz reviews.
Does Stake or BitStarz have higher rakeback?
Stake advertises higher rakeback (3.5% vs —).
Are Stake and BitStarz no-KYC?
Up to a point. Both are no-KYC for everyday play, but identity verification kicks in for larger withdrawals (typically above ~$10,000) or on risk flags, and Stake now verifies before any withdrawal. "No-KYC" means no checks by default, not never.
18+. Gambling involves risk: gamble responsibly (BeGambleAware.org · GamCare.org.uk).