An independent, data-led comparison of Stake and BitStarz on the factors that matter — license, rakeback, KYC and live races. Rankings are independent; outbound links are affiliate links.
| License | Rakeback | KYC | Live races | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stake | Curaçao (Medium Rare N.V. group) | — | KYC upfront | 1 |
| BitStarz | Curaçao OGL/2024/165/0185 (Gareton B.V.) | — | No-KYC up to ≈ $10,000 | 0 |
The verdict
for live races on SLOTSBONUS, Stake has more (1 vs 0); both list a gambling license; and Stake verifies KYC upfront while the other stays no-KYC up to ~$10k.
Full breakdowns: Stake review · BitStarz review.
Stake vs BitStarz — FAQ
Is Stake or BitStarz better?
Neither wins outright — it depends what you value. for live races on SLOTSBONUS, Stake has more (1 vs 0); both list a gambling license; and Stake verifies KYC upfront while the other stays no-KYC up to ~$10k. See the table above and our full Stake and BitStarz reviews.
Does Stake or BitStarz have higher rakeback?
Stake and BitStarz advertise comparable rakeback (— vs —).
Are Stake and BitStarz no-KYC?
Up to a point. Both are no-KYC for everyday play, but identity verification kicks in for larger withdrawals (typically above ~$10,000) or on risk flags — and Stake now verifies before any withdrawal. "No-KYC" means no checks by default, not never.
18+. Gambling involves risk — gamble responsibly (BeGambleAware.org · GamCare.org.uk).